Why Text-Link-Ads.com works better than AdBrite.com?
I have used both of them on AdesDesign.net and AdesBlog.com, and on both cases Text-Link-Ads performed better than AdBrite. When I used AdBrite for about 1 month on AdesDesign, I didn’t get any advertisers, however when I tried Text-Link-Ads I got few links within a week. I am not sure if it has something to do with payment options, AdBrite concentrates too much on CPC (Cost Per Click) and most of the time the rates are based on CPC. On the other hand Text-Link-Ads charges flat rates only, on month-to-month basis. I guess it’s less headache for advertisers with Text-Link-Ads when they want to choose a site to advertise, they don’t have to calculate how much it will cost for them each click and how much he/she has to fork out every month.
So for those out there if you have been using AdBrite with no avail, you might want to give Text-Link-Ads a try. Maybe there is some good money waiting for you.
www.text-link-ads.com www.adbrite.com
Related Posts
- Text Link Ads - affiliate program that works
- Sold my first Post-Level-Ad on my PR4 page
- TLA’s WP Post-Level-Ads plugin coming soon
- Will Google buy Text-Link-Ads.com?
- Sold another Post-Level-Ad
By SEO Expert on Dec 8, 2007
People buying links for SEO purposes will likely use text-link-ads as they are pure links (direct to the purchasers web site) as opposed to javascript generated AdBrite ads which redirect through AdBrite’s tracking server.
As someone potentially buying links AdBrite is better suited for targeted consumer traffic, as Text-Link-Ads is more suitable for contextually relevant links from high page rank sites… Note that the latter has recently been targeted by Google.